– The Backcountry Ski Site
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures

– The Backcountry Ski Site

  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures

Technical — Dynafit ZZeus Boot Construction and Performance

by Lou Dawson June 19, 2008
written by Lou Dawson

If you didn’t figure it out yet, we’re as excited as kids on Christmas morning when it comes to all the new Dynafit compatible “beef boots” that have risen from the horizon like a flaming sunrise after a month of storm. Today I thought it only fair to take the WildSnow microscope back to Dynafit’s ZZeus TF-X (latter standing for Thermoflex Extreme liner), which is arguably the king of such boots, since it is Dynafit’s own offering. Before you go farther, please know we’ve got a few other ZZeus reviews that compliment what you’ll see below. My firstlook is here, and check out Lee’s.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Dynafit ZZeus beef boot is an excellent offering for backcountry skiing.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Unlike my Green Machines, the color looks as good in my pickup bed as it does up in Aspen. I guess this is the “freeride” style. Fine by me, as I noticed a few rednecks frowning at my Green Machines, no doubt wondering what something of that color was doing in the back of a Chevy.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
These are indeed boots with an interchangeable sole system. The touring version has a nice rubber sole and of course Dynafit binding fittings. What impresses me about the swap configuration is how precisely the sole block keys to slots molded in the boot shell. Achieving this type of precision can’t be easy. Along with an interlock, the heel portion of the sole attaches with four screws (including the screw in the actual Dynafit heel fitting).

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
View inside the heel block, showing binding fitting screw. One concern I have with this type of sole system is that the screws simply self-thread into the boot’s shell plastic. After a given number of repeated fasten/unfasten cycles, such thread will eventually wear and be prone to stripping. My guess is this won’t be a problem for occasional sole swapping, but do so every few days for a season and the story might be different. Thus, not a concern for most people — but keep it in mind if you plan on swapping soles frequently.

Colorado backcountry skiing.
Greek gods on my feet, what has the world come to?

Except for this winter’s testing of the new AT overlaps, it’s been years since I’ve skied in such boots. But I’m not unfamiliar with the feel, since shoes such as the venerable Garmont Gara are fond memories from my day.

“Progressive flex” indeed describes it best. You press your shin forward, and instead of the bouncy energy and abrupt stop of a tongue boot such as Dynafit ZZero or Garmont Megaride, you get a sensation that’s more like you’re pressing against live muscle resistance than inert plastic. It’s a more natural feeling — and one I wish they’d work harder on building into tongue boots. Beyond feeling better, such boots can actually help you ski better by absorbing vibration more effectively and transferring leverage to your skis with smooth precision.

What’s more, properly designed overlap boots tour just as good or better then tongue boots. This includes ZZeus.

So why not just use overlap boots for backcountry skiing? Two things. Most importantly, overlap boots can be much harder to get into than tongue boots (because they don’t open with a “door” as tongue boots do). If you’re booting up indoors with warm flexible plastic, not a big deal. But try the same thing while on your back in a tent, at 3:00 A.M. during a frigid winter morning, and the story may sound more like a George Carlin excretory monologue than the mumbled pleasantries such situations should engender in gentile alpinists. Of lesser concern, overlap boots may weigh slightly more than tongue boots (due to extra layers of plastic). For those that want it or need it, the performance of overlap boots will certainly be worth these compromises. But they’re valid considerations — especially in the case of getting the boots on your feet (step one in a day of skiing?).

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Back to construction details. Toe has similar features to heel, in that the interchangeable sole fits into slots with a satisfying click, then attaches with six screws.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Detail of toe sole block. The front two of six screws go through the Dynafit fitting for 100% confidence. You’d have to rip your foot of your leg before you could rip this sole off the boot.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Yeah baby, the feature every ski boot should have. Not everyone needs cuff canting, but when you do…

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Lean lock is similar to other Dynafit boot models (and other brands as well). It has two locked positions, but it’s almost impossible to tell which one you’re in. Adjustable mechanisms such as that of the Scarpa Spirit are perhaps better, but add weight. We prefer having just one position and tweaking forward lean during boot fitting. Some skiers gripe that the Dynafit lean lock switch is small and hard to work with gloved hands. We never had that problem. Most importantly, this type of lock functions by having a spring loaded pin snap into a hole in a steel bar. On cold days you can get ice in this mechanism and it won’t work, ditto for dirt or sand. With some brands/models the lean mechanism is easy to remove and clean or repair. In the case of ZZeus you’d probably have to remove the boot cuff to do this. Something else to keep in mind, especially for you modders out there.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Let’s not forget underthings! ZZeus TF-X thermo liner is a beautifully constructed shoe that’s truly a work of art. If you’re prone to wearing out liners, these might change your life. They’re packed with dense foam that enhances downhill performance and resists packout. Liner is a thick wool Loden felt that doesn’t feel clammy when damp and probably wears better than thin Lycra like fabric. Outer covering is Cordura nylon that can stand up to all sorts of abuse (X in name means extremely durable). The liners even have their own lasted rubber sole. Such liners do add a few ounces to the overall boot weight, but they’re ounces with direct positive consequence (and you can always use slightly lighter aftermarket liners if desired.)

Important thing about the liners (this could be pro or con) is that Dynafit says not to mold them in an oven (at home or professional), instead they need to be molded using the blower/tower system that’s become more common of late (and harder to lash up at home). The liner does come pre-molded in half-sizes, so they may fit quite a few feet directly out of the box — that’ll be nice for mail order or for getting out of the shop quickly. Downside, if you do need liner molding you’ll be dependent on a dealer or properly equipped boot fitter for the job.

What else? Mainly, know that the different colored plastic on top of the ZZeus forefoot area is actually two separately molded pieces attached by rivets. Not only does this allow for sophisticated and dare I say artistic molding, but also lets the overlap area conform nicely to your foot instead of crushing directly down as some folks experience with overlap boots.

Beyond that, everything is fairly standard for a well designed AT boot: quality buckles; nicely attached power strap; soft rubber seal at front of overlap; front buckle in a reasonably protected location. Oh, and how about weight? According to our scales, with its beefed liner the ZZeus does have some mass, but look at the weight of the shell, which is very light for this stiff an overlap boot. Thus, our point about the liner adding quality that’s worth the ounces is a good one (and with a lighter liner, you could create a lighter but still stiff boot). In all, a ZZeus TF-X is worthy choice if you’re looking for a beefy overlap boot.

(And the eternal question, will I give up my Green Machines for a pair of ZZeus? In truth, I do enjoy skiing a beef boot on occasion, but my Green Machines work fine for nearly everything I do. Much of that is simply based on style. I don’t ski as aggressively as I used to, hence a lighter boot works for me. Even so, we’re super excited about beef boots such as ZZeus because so many excellent skiers have been needing such boots for years — and we want you all to be happy out there!)

Shop for Dynafit alpine touring boots here.

Lou Dawson

WildSnow.com publisher emeritus and founder Lou (Louis Dawson) has a 50+ years career in climbing, backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering. He was the first person in history to ski down all 54 Colorado 14,000-foot peaks, has authored numerous books about about backcountry skiing, and has skied from the summit of Denali in Alaska, North America’s highest mountain.

www.loudawson.com
June 19, 2008 55 comments
0 Email

Dynafit ZZeus Boots and Manaslu Skis

by Lee Lau June 10, 2008
written by Lee Lau

The Dynafit ZZeus boots and Manaslu skis have already had a thorough dissection by Lou (and he’s got another ZZeus review on tap here for publication in a few days, as he’s been using the boots on occasion up at Independence Pass.) I contacted WildSnow and asked Lou if he wanted another take — to add impressions from my own perspective outside of Wildsnow’s usual circle of reviewers. “Sure!” was the answer, so here goes.

Dynafit’s Canadian reps loaned me a set of boots, skis and Dynafit Speed Skins for review. I managed to get about five days on the gear – three corn days and two powder; enough to get the flavor of the equipment. I weigh 155 lbs and ski mainly in the Coast Mountains of British Columbia in the Vancouver/Whistler/Squamish area. My skiing is usually in fairly high moisture-content snow. Accordingly, my preference is for bigger skis and boots.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Side by side comparison of Garmont’s MegaRide; Dynafit’s ZZeus; and Scarpa’s Spirit 3

Weight

I weighed the boots on a kitchen scale (also, check out Lou’s boot weight comparo.) ZZeus is not light – 1950g for a single boot! Stuffing my Intuition liners in the boots dropped 100g; significant weight savings (the provided Dynafit liner is a hefty 320g, but to be fair is a super beefy and durable inner that probably holds up to wear and tear better than nearly anything else).

From Lou’s review and his articles re gear weights, you already know that Manaslu is among the lightest of the 90mm + waisted skis out there, at 1457gr per ski in the 178 cms size. While these are not inexpensive skis, you have to lay even more cash for a pair of Goode Carbons or other more esoteric brands if you want such weight savings. So, nice to see Dynafit living up to their marketing story.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Garmont’s MegaRide; Dynafit’s ZZeus; and Scarpa’s Spirit 3 – different buckle philosophies.

On Snow Performance – boots

ZZeus is made out of PU Plastic, which gets stiffer as temperatures drop. Since I was using the boot in mild spring temperatures I never got to assess how much ZZeus would change in flex – that will be something to watch out for in the colder part of the year.

On the uphill and flats, ZZeus felt fine but didn’t strike me as anything revolutionary in touring performance. Rearward cuff motion is excellent, and at the forward end of a stride you’ll enjoy not being blocked by a tongue, though in a long stride you’ll still feel resistance from the lower overlap. Indeed, it was amazing to to look down at my feet and see an overlap boot that looked so much like an alpine shoe yet had a perfectly serviceable touring stride. (Please consider such muted praise in the context that it is a boot designed to be biased towards downhill performance.)

For bootpacking, ZZeus also felt fine. The sole has decent grip and the boot flexes acceptably. During my limited days of testing there was no tendency for the buckles to flip open when walking in snow. Still, with their fresh start in design it would have been nice if Dynafit had done something more inventive to totally protect the lower two buckles from damage or inadvertent opening. The ZZeus’s extra hefty weight was not that apparent during my test days. Although the tours were of the 1600m/5000 ft variety they were just day trips; it is my experience that extra weight really begins to show its detriments on tours longer than that, (or at altitude like Colorado skiers have to suffer with).

The downhill is of course where Zzeus shines. As billed in ski industry buzz, overlap boots are meant to offer a more progressive feel in downhill performance – as opposed to the on – off control of tongued boots. Zzeus lives up to the hype. Edge transfer and weighting of skis felt telepathic on these boots. Buckles are slightly cammed and are easy to engage and tighten. The boot feels tight but not constricting and my heel was held down without undue pressure. At my weight and aggression level, ZZeus felt perfect – neither too soft nor too stiff.

With that said, if the Zzeus is perfect for me could it be too little boot for heavier skiers or overkill for lighter or more finesse skiers? I’d say the latter is axiomatic (as many skiers seem to do fine on much less beefy boots), but the jury is still out on just how ZZeus will fit in the now vast selection of what Lou calls “beef boots.” Perhaps most importantly, there seems to be no way to easily tune ZZeus either for more or less stiffness or cuff angle (though the cant rivet will be appreciated by those who need it). Perhaps I am looking the gift horse of a perfectly dialed ski boot in the mouth, but these are considerations to raise given the customizability of some other touring boot offerings.

Summary

If I were a light to medium sized skier who predominantly skied inbounds with short trips to the backcountry, I would make the Dynafit ZZeus boot one of the first boots I would try. It has that beautiful unquantifiable “feel” which is almost a requirement to make alpine equipment perform well. However, even the dedicated ski tourer will be impressed by the tourability and downhill performance combined in this package. Beyond that, the swappable soles are beautifully engineered and the liner is stunning (if slightly heavy).

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
ZZeus has hard stops in the interior – like most modern boots.

On Snow Performance – Manaslu Skis

I didn’t quite know what to make of the Manaslu. To be perfectly honest, I already have a nice pair of 90mm skis with Dynafits with which I am content and was a little reluctant to distract myself from the ZZeus review. Moreover, the Manaslu was billed as a powder ski and when I started the review in mid April, I anticipated that SW British Columbia would be entering corn season shortly.

To try to not have too much variability in the ski-boot equation I used my own personal pair of Garmont MegaRides with Manaslu; first in firm hardpack conditions in some tours in local Vancouver ski area mountains. When a late-season low-pressure system coincided with cold front resulting in a dump of snow I also managed to get in some decent tours using the skis in soft snow.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
On the left, new Scarpa plug liners. On the right, Dynafit TPX liners that come stock with ZZeus

Unsurprisingly, the Manaslu toured well. It’s incredibly light. Paired with the also very light Dynafit Speed Skins, the ski is a joy when climbing.

Manaslu has a slight twin tip in the tail but more radically, has quite a bit of reverse camber at the tip; a design feature that is supposed to make it easier to initiate turns in powder. Please read Lou’s review for more color about the design of Manaslu – including the ski geometry and reasons for the design.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Tip and tail differences between Manaslu and a more traditional design – the Atomic R:EX

Manaslu performed quite nicely in corn and firm snow. That is to say, it performed as well as any 90mm + waisted ski would be expected to perform. It didn’t rail turns like a slalom carver but it did hold an edge. One does not buy a fat ski for its hardpack performance; so I was stoked when a dump of snow hit the mountains north of Pemberton and I managed to get some turns using the Manaslu in powder.

In powder, Manaslu came alive on a bigger slope where I could let the ski run a bit more in larger radius turns (2 laps on a 45 to 40 degree slope; each lap being 300+ meters) They are very stable at speed; I could ski them backseat and let the skis really run or stay centered and lay tracks on the slope with utmost confidence while watching sluff roar downhill.

In low speed to medium speed turns Manaslu was underwhelming. The ski felt a tad sluggish and required some degree of up and down unweighting to initiate edges. More, I was surprised by the tendency of the big tip to wander in low speed turns. Granted, some of this could have been caused by my chosen mounting position, or my simply not being used to the ski (I didn’t have a lot of time on them). But worth noting. As always, demo if possible so you can decide for yourself.

My conclusion: Due to their girth and specialization, Manaslu is not an all-around one quiver ski. It is, however, worthy of consideration by a person rounding out their arsenal. The lack of weight combined with adequate girth is especially attractive.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Lee testing the Dynafit skis & boots on Mt. Matier.

(Guest blogger Lee Lau is an avid skier and outdoorsman embarking on many adventures with his loving, and sometimes concerned wife, Sharon. He has over 15 years of experience skiing, ski-touring and dabbles in mountaineering. In the “off-season” he is occasionally found working in his day job as an intellectual property lawyer when he is not mountain biking. As a resident of Vancouver, British Columbia, Lee’s playground extends mainly to Western Canada, including South West B.C. and the Selkirks.)

Lee Lau

Guest blogger Lee Lau is an avid skier and outdoorsman embarking on many adventures with his loving, and sometimes concerned wife, Sharon. He has over 15 years of experience skiing, ski-touring and dabbles in mountaineering. In the “off-season” he is occasionally found working in his day job as an intellectual property lawyer when he is not mountain biking. As a resident of Vancouver, British Columbia, Lee’s playground extends mainly to Western Canada, including South West B.C. and the Selkirks.

www.leelau.net/sharonandlee/
June 10, 2008 13 comments
0 Email

Skiing on the Scarpa Skookum Backcountry Boot – Guest Review

by Lou Dawson May 14, 2008
written by Lou Dawson

Text and photos by Lee Lau

This is a followup to my previous WildSnow Scarpa Skookum review, with emphasis on the subjective feel of the boots as opposed to quantitative measures. I got my impressions of the boot’s skiing and touring ability by comparing the Skookum against other boots that I have recently used: Garmont Mega-Ride (1650g), Dynafit Zzero 4 carbon boot(1585g), Dynafit ZZeus (1800g); Scarpa Spirit 4 (1870g). The Garmont MegaRide in particular is a four-buckle Dynafit compatible boot veteran now into its fifth year and serves as an adequate baseline for subjective impressions.

Backcountry skiing.
Lineup, Skookum in middle, Spirit to left, Mega Ride to right.

I skied the Scarpa Skookum with 185cms Salomon Guns, and with 178 cm Dynafit Manaslu skis. Both skis were mounted with Dynafit Verticals. The boots saw use over a five day period of ski touring; 2 days in powder and 3 days in corn and spring slush.

Reviewer’s biases
My ski touring career spans about 13 years, starting out on leather telemark boots and three-pin bindings and migrating to alpine touring setups consisting of Fritschi Diarmir Freerides and Dynafits with a variety of skis. My touring time mostly consists of day-trips, weekend multi-day trips and two or three multi-day traverses during a season. I weigh 155 lbs and ski mainly in the Coast Mountains of British Columbia in the Vancouver/Whistler/Squamish area. Local mid-winter snow is usually of the higher water content variety, thus necessitating bigger skis paired with boots that will drive them.

Backcountry skiing.
Approaching Anniversary Col in the Joffre Group – 1100m approach skinning

Touring – skinning performance
Skookum comes with two tongues: an incredibly rigid orange tongue and a silver, soft touring tongue. The tongues can be swapped without tools. I first tried the Skookum with the stiff alpine tongue and found that tongue-boot combination to be underwhelming. Even with all buckles undone, the boot felt stiff and blocky; almost like skinning in an alpine boot.

Backcountry skiing.
Scarpa Spirit 4 also comes with two tongues, similar to Skookum.

I was disappointed as my previous experiences had been to the effect that Scarpa’s boots were superior touring boots, having some of the nicest progressive flex patterns among boot manufacturers. Thankfully, my faith in the joy of Scarpa boots on the skintrack was restored when I put the touring tongue on the Skookum. The touring tongue transforms the boot; there’s a nice amount of freedom in the foot and gliding on the track feels natural. For me, the Skookum has that magical Scarpa touring feel – when you use it with the touring tongue.

Bootpacking and hiking
Spring skiing missions often involve foot travel, be it walking or climbing. Thus, in my opinion a ski boot is of acceptable quality should allow the foot traveling skier to get to their objective safely and in decent time, with at least a modicum of comfort. With that criteria in mind, Skookum passes. It’s certainly neither a 5.10 rock shoe nor a light, comfortable approach shoe, but it works. The boot’s sole has grippy lugs; it accepts crampons easily and the generous cuff movement and support allows a certain amount of flexibility for mildly technical moves.

Backcountry skiing.
Skiing the Joffre Peak spine line.

Skiing
If my comments are lukewarm with respect to the Skookum’s bootpacking/hiking performance and tourability it may be because the Skookum design is biased towards the downhill end of the uphill/downhill trade-off. To that end, Scarpa’s designers have succeeded. With the alpine tongue, I found the boot to be too stiff – almost dead in its feel. A heavier skier might need that support and appreciate it, but at my light weight the boots seemed to isolate me from feel of my skis. With the touring tongue installed, the boots were transformed. The fabled Scarpa progression was evident; small variations in fore-aft lean allowed me to control downward motion with confidence. The Skookum’s lateral stiffness is also more then adequate – laying turns through powder then dropping through variable snow with equal ease. (I received and skied prototypes that will be re-designed to introduce more progression into the production version of the boot. This will likely make a really good boot even better.)

I never did get to try the Skookum in hard-pack or groomers. I suspect that they would shine in that situation (especially with a narrow-waisted ski) due to their stiffness when equipped with the stiff alpine tongue – but that is not typically the primary reason for the ski tourer to purchase a boot.

Some quibbles: The catches on which the Skookum’s buckles engage are prone to icing up. A well – placed prod with a ski pole solves that. The Skookum buckles are difficult to engage, particularly when using the stiff alpine tongue. Perhaps some camming mechanism could be designed into the buckles?

Backcountry skiing.
Lee’s test zone — skiing Mt. Matier.

SUMMARY
Skookum is incredibly tuneable and is the closest I have seen to a one boot quiver; versatile enough for inbounds, general backcountry and traverses. Perhaps that is because Scarpa hasn’t really approached the Skookum as if it was one boot but has seen fit to accessorize it with various options that garage mechanics, hobbyists and professional boot fitters around the world have for years used to customize boots (eg., different tongue flexes, booster straps etc.).

In summary, Skookum tours well, is comfortable on bootpacks and hikes — and does drive those bigger skis just the way I like.

Cons:
* Relatively heavy
* Almost too stiff when used with the alpine tongue (lighter skiers should use the touring tongue)
* Buckles could be better

Pros:
* Smart design offers incredibly versatility with interchangeable tongues, removable spoilers, Booster straps etc.
* Terrific Intuition stock OE liner
* Will comfortably drive big skis

Shop for Scarpa alpine touring boots here.

Lou Dawson

WildSnow.com publisher emeritus and founder Lou (Louis Dawson) has a 50+ years career in climbing, backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering. He was the first person in history to ski down all 54 Colorado 14,000-foot peaks, has authored numerous books about about backcountry skiing, and has skied from the summit of Denali in Alaska, North America’s highest mountain.

www.loudawson.com
May 14, 2008 27 comments
0 Email

Black Diamond Method Boots & Kastle Skis — Do the Math for a Longer Season

by Dave Downing May 2, 2008
written by Dave Downing

The calendar says early May, however I’m pretty sure the snowpack looks like Mid-March. We still have a lot of skiing ahead. So as we approach our 7th month of turns, we need to conserve our energy so we can make it to August, right? So, how do we do this?

Proper diet and exercise with well proportioned rest between ski trips? Never!

The best way to stay strong through the long snow season is simpler than you might think. Take your average number of ski days (S) multiplied by your average amount of vert (V), then divide this number by the average vertical drop per turn (D). ( S x V ) / D This should give you the total number of turns you make per season. For an epic season such as this, lets assume you’re all getting after it, so you should double your average ski days. So, simply double the size of your turns, and waa-laa, you just reduced your energy needs by half. Now, considering that with the longer season, you are actually getting exponentially worn down for every day out (less rest, earlier starts, etc.) you may want to increase you turn radius even more. If this makes sense, then you are next asking yourself, what is the best backcountry ski rig for conserving energy?

Backcountry skiing.
No need to let late-season burnout stop your stoke. Proper motivation at work helps to keep your focus on skiing. WildSnow can help with the first edition WildSnow.com desktop image, available in 3 sizes 1600×1200 , 1680×1050 , 1280×854 )

The Answer:
Despite common sense (and the wisdom obtained by Lou after decades ski alpinism), the most energy conserving setup is NOT a pair of Titanium Dynafits mounted on a pair of 142 cm foam skis “driven” by a single buckle boot. NO! The setup to end all set ups is a pair of BD Method Boots on a pair of Kastle MX98 skis (though I’ll concede that if Dynafits will hold me in they could be the binding of choice.)

The Boots:
BD Method boots are the younger twin of the Factor. Coming in just 6oz lighter and at a 110 flex (instead of the Methods 130) they are still a beast of a shoe, and that is a compliment in my book. They come standard with a removable AT sole you can swap with an Alpine DIN block for resort skiing. Like their only-slightly-bigger-brother, Methods are fully Dynafit compatible, have adjustable canting and forward lean — all with an overlap cuff. A few other quick facts: thermoformable liner; BOA liner retention system; micro-adjust buckles; solid 1-inch cuff strap.

Basically you can go fast in these boots, in all snow conditions, saving energy all along the way. These boots pleasantly tore through a 1-inch ice crust at Marble. There was no slop or delay in my turns through the bullet-proof, both of which would have lead to either ugly form, or worse, loss of that commonly held trait of most homo sapiens, remain upright on two legs. Over on Ski Hayden, the Methods held solid in a high-speed energy conservation maneuver on the Stammberger Face, and had Maroon Bowl feeling like a ski resort (or was that just the lifts to get to the top (grin). I was extremely happy with these boots as an alpine boot I can be comfortable skinning and hiking with.

Backcountry skiing.
Setting up for some energy conservation on the Stammberger Face, Hayden Peak. This could be worth an entire run come August.

Being familiar with the walk from the snowcat pickup at Highlands up the ridge line to the Maroon Bowl in alpine boots made the ease of walking in the Methods exceptionally welcome. I was then able to casually transition from winter snow, to ice, to corn and funk. A direct transfer of power from leg to ski was evident all week. Front-pointing back up the fifteen feet to Castle Creek Road went by in a breeze (now all my reviews will include a front point eval, after some of you took me to task on leaving that out last time). All in all another great boot by BD. Since the slightly softer flex of the Method was a little nicer skinning, I would make it my pick of the two for human powered vert.

Colorado backcountry skiing.

The Skis:
What ski is the best for an effortless ski season? Why just the most perfect ski ever created. Is this hyperbole? Not really. The Kastle MX98 can rightly challenge any ski for that title, largely due to the history and experience behind the ski. Kastle has a long tradition of exceptional skis. Long before I knew what powder was, how to carve, or even how to keep my skis parallel, World Championship gold medals were being won on Kastles. The first in 1947, the last in 1997 just after Benetton Sportssystem shuts down the Kastle brand (read about it on Kastle’s website ). So these skis are historically bred to go fast. And with models such as the “Tour Randonne” released in 1977 as the lightest ski in the world designed for mountaineers (which Lou skied on for several seasons during his prime), they are meant for big mountains.

Back to present, and I love these skis. With a sidecut of 132-98-177 in a 184cm length, the MX98 is a perfect backcountry tool. It is not a soft ski. It is not a forgiving ski. And this ski will finish a decent with or without your input. It’s up to you to drive it for an amazing run through (and I mean through) any terrain. On a recent trip to Marble Peak, cold winds and a tight schedule meant we were skiing a 1-inch ice crust well before the sun would soften it. After leading the second pitch, others in the group commented after watching my run that they thought the snow had improved, only to realize how deceived they had been as they skied the same line on their wimpy planks. I thank the wide platform of the MX98. Also, the amount of energy that releases out of each turn allowed for more than enough power to drive into the next turn. I’d say that it was effortless, but conditions such as what we had are NEVER effortless…just fun.

I skied the MX98 mounted with a pair of Marker Dukes. So needless to say, the setup was heavy. Kastle recommends using either a Duke or Jester binding. If this were purely my powder day / side country setup, I would go with the Duke. They felt bomber in-bounds, and the tour acceptably. The biggest drawback for climbing with this setup was the limited heel-raise available on the binding (there is only one setting). Luckily you can buy these skis sans bindings — if I had the chance I would put a pair of Dynafits on them in a heartbeat.

In the End:
So this spring, remember that the key to preserving yourself for the entire season is simple addition: ( S x V ) / D + Black Diamond Method + Kastle MX98s.

**Disclaimer, not responsible for anything if you actually try this.

Dave Downing

Dave “Snowman” Downing lives in Whitefish, Montana where Dave is a freelance designer and owner of Ovid Nine Graphics Lab Dave’s ski career began due to a lack of quality skiing video games for NES.

www.ovidnine.com
May 2, 2008 13 comments
0 Email

Guest Review – Scarpa Skookum Backcountry Ski Boots

by Lee Lau April 24, 2008
written by Lee Lau

Scarpa’s Skookum is a new downhill oriented yet Dynafit compatible AT boot they’ll be distributing for the 08/09 season. If you’ve wanted something that’s still good for those big climbs but yields more driving power than the Spirit 4, keep these shoes in mind.

Weight
I weighed the Scarpa Skookum boots on a kitchen scale: 1800g for a single boot (just under 4lbs). To provide some comparables the Mega Ride (my current and well worn boot) is 1640g while the Spirit 3 is 1650g. All these boots are size 27.

Package
Tinkering with and modifying touring equipment is a time-honored tradition and boots are no exception. For example, many have modified the 4 buckle Garmont Mega Ride with stiffer tongues, higher performance liners and booster straps or have altered forward lean angles – all towards improving downhill performance. Scarpa has recognized and accommodated the reality of garage ingenuity by shipping the Skookum with booster straps and two types of tongues; a stiff downhill-biased tongue and a softer touring-biased tongue.

Another positive of the high-end Scarpa boots is that Intuition’s wonderfully warm and moldable liners are delivered with them as original equipment. The production Skookums will be delivered with Intuition’s new plug liner – supposedly stiffer but just as comfortable as Intuition’s already high-performance Speed Pro liners/Alpine liners which came OE in last year’s Scarpa offerings.

Boot Height
I took the picture below with a wide angle lens so there is some distortion to the sides of the picture – hopefully the lines on the siding will help restore perspective. The Skookum is picture center and is shown with the stiffer tongue. The front cuff of the Skookum is noticeably lower then that of either the Spirit 3 (left) or the Mega Ride (right). I suspect that the tall and stiff downhill tongue shipped with the Skookum will mean that the relative shortness of the Skookum’s front cuff will not be detrimental to skiing performance.

The Spirit 3 and the Skookum have similar lean angles; a two stage setting of either 19 or 23 degrees.

Scarpa backcountry skiing.

Note that the rear spoilers on the Spirit 3, Skookum, and Mega Ride are at about the same level so the rear of the boots are approximately the same height (ignore the height of the Intuition liners as they are my liners and will not come stock with the boot – see above note).

Walk/Ski Switch
The walk mechanism of the Skookum is similar to the Mega Ride and departs from the circular mechanism used in the Spirit 3 and 4 from last year. The up-down flip lever used in the Skookum will be prone to clogging up with ice and snow when boot-packing and is susceptible to switching from downhill to walk mode on its own also when boot-packing. I am not sure why Scarpa chose to regress from last season’s design.

Scarpa backcountry skiing.

Front Height
Front view of the three boots gives a better idea of the relative shortness of the Skookum’s front cuff. In contrast observe the remarkable height of the shipped downhill tongue on the Skookum as compared to the Scarpa tongue of last year on the Spirit 3. Note that both the Skookum and the Spirit 3 have the wraparound stiffening reinforcement around the bottom last of the boot shell. I anticipate that this harder plastic might help downhill performance as the bottom Pebax plastic shell of the Garmont Mega Ride (which lacks a similar stiffening reinforcement) flexes noticeably when the boot is engaged.

Scarpa backcountry skiing.

Interior Details
The next picture shows the interior of the Skookum and below that, the Spirit 3’s interior. A large removable spoiler is provided, a feature which the Spirit 4, 3 and the Mega Ride lack. Scarpa’s attention to detail can also be noted in that the buckles can be removed with tools. Why can’t all brands of boots do that, it seems so simple…? Note that the inside bottom of the boot is hard plastic; those with cold feet could possibly add some foam padding on the bottom interior of the boot. Also consider taping over the hard metal edges of the inside nuts of the buckles so that your liner doesn’t get prematurely scuffed (as with any AT boot).

Note the flex limiters on the interior of the boot; providing a hard-stop to prevent the boot from flexing too far forward. This is a design attribute shared by many of the newer crop of AT boots (including the Scarpa Spirit 4, 3, F3 and the Dynafit lineup) but not by the more venerable offerings (the Garmont Mega Ride and G-Ride or Scarpa Denali). These hard stops are intended to help disperse the force of downhill skiing not only to the cuff but also to the lower boot shell. Some users find this hard stop to be a too-harsh way of limiting travel — for example, I’ve taken to grinding out the offending plastic. As Lou has noted here many times, boots with things you can modify or remove for performance are much nicer than boots you have to practically build from scratch, so good to see that trend.

Scarpa backcountry skiing.

Scarpa backcountry skiing.

As stated in passing above, the Skookum comes OE with the Booster Strap, yet again showing Scarpa’s attention to detail. More, the stock Booster Strap is modified to make installation and use tidy and clean with the incorporation of velcro backing so that the strap can be stowed after it is tightened (and it can easily be removed if just the boot buckles are enough for you.)

Buckles
This last picture shows the Skookum buckles. Style-wise they are not the most streamlined design. Indeed, in use in heavy snow, the buckles do trend to attract a fair share of buildup of snow. The Skookum’s buckles do not share the same heel-ankle lock-down positioning as the Spirit 4 and 3’s buckles and are in the more traditional ski – boot location. To keep Lou and those with his genes happy, there are also canting adjustments on the Skookum located on the inside and outside of the boot shell.

Scarpa backcountry skiing.

I am told by Scarpa that the top plastic cuff of the Skookum will be changed in some manner. As presently designed the plastic for the top two buckles on the Skookum contact the tongue prematurely. Scarpa feels that the prototype boot has restricted cuff movement in both uphill and downhill modes. I will attempt to take this into account when testing the boot’s on-snow performance. Skiing the boot will tell the tale, but I’m very optimistic about this shoe, perhaps it’ll even grace my feet next season.

Shop for Scarpa Skookum AT ski boot here.

Other useful links
* Lee’s Spirit 4 and F3 review.
* Scarpa video previewing the new line of boots for 2008-9
* Previous WildSnow Skookum first look.

Scarpa Press Release:

Unleashing the most sophisticated combination yet of downhill performance in a touring- and mountaineering-friendly package, SCARPA North America will release two new hard-charging freeride boots for Fall 2008, the Typhoon and the women’s specific Domina. In addition, SCARPA will also unveil the Skookum, a boot for big skis and big lines that are also Dynafit compatible.

For sidecountry adventures or ski touring and mountaineering with the ultimate in control, these three boots set the bar in the freeride/alpine-touring category. They’re ideal for the skier that needs a super rigid boot for aggressive terrain yet wants the versatility to put it in walk mode for that quick boot up the ridge or the tour to reach a steep descent.

SHELLS: Built with 100 percent Pebax, the best material available for building lightweight ski boots that can retain their stiffness over the widest range of temperatures, the Typhoon, Domina and Skookum employ dual-injected V-Frame power-ribs on the cuffs for extraordinary rigidity. A walk/tour mode keeps things comfy when not in downhill mode. Four buckles and a power strap lock things down for the ride. These boots come with hinged tongues for touring as well as ski tongues that easily swap out for a 20 percent increase in boot stiffness. The Skookum adds tech fittings in the lower shell for Dynafit compatibility. It also comes with Scarpa’s booster power strap.

LINER: Intuition liners are the best thermo-moldable liners in the business, renowned for resistance to pack-out and warmth, which is why SCARPA boots come stock with them. The new SCARPA Intuition Speed Pro liners, used in the Typhoon, Domina and Skookum, are built with an alpine-style tongue, which allows SCARPA to increase their rigidity, translating to a stiffer overall boot design. Yet the way they are stiffened on the back of the cuff means they still have excellent range of motion when in walk mode. Liners come lasted for men’s and women’s feet respectively, and the thermo-molding process fine-tunes the fit.

SOLES: Notable because it’s the only DIN-standard rubberized sole on the market that can be skied in alpine or alpine-touring bindings without changing out any parts, the SCARPA/Vibram Ride sole comes standard on the Typhoon and Domina. This offers the maximum security in the widest range of binding interfaces with excellent traction for icy conditions. For those who prefer a burlier lugged mountaineering sole, the SCARPA Rally lugged sole can easily be added to either boot. The Skookum employs a touring friendly lugged sole.

SPECS: Typhoon and Domina: 4 pounds, 3 ounces per boot (size 27); forward lean 19 and 23 degrees; Retail $699. Skookum: Retail $769.

(Guest blogger Lee Lau is an avid skier and outdoorsman embarking on many adventures with his loving, and sometimes concerned wife, Sharon. He has over 15 years of experience skiing, ski-touring and dabbles in mountaineering. In the “off-season” he is occasionally found working in his day job as an intellectual property lawyer when he is not mountain biking. As a resident of Vancouver, British Columbia, Lee’s playground extends mainly to Western Canada, including South West B.C. and the Selkirks.)

Lee Lau

Guest blogger Lee Lau is an avid skier and outdoorsman embarking on many adventures with his loving, and sometimes concerned wife, Sharon. He has over 15 years of experience skiing, ski-touring and dabbles in mountaineering. In the “off-season” he is occasionally found working in his day job as an intellectual property lawyer when he is not mountain biking. As a resident of Vancouver, British Columbia, Lee’s playground extends mainly to Western Canada, including South West B.C. and the Selkirks.

www.leelau.net/sharonandlee/
April 24, 2008 34 comments
0 Email

Novella or Dynafit Gear Review? Rob Delivers.

by Rob Mullins April 17, 2008
written by Rob Mullins

photos by Josh Kato

Shop for Dynafit skis and boots here.

My Dynafit Zzero boots, ski and binding setups have allowed me to satisfy my long quest for the perfect ski touring setup. Admittedly, I have some level of addiction to owning randonnee ski gear since that perfect setup, rather than one rig, is in my case, three separate combinations of boot, binding and ski. Those rigs are:

– Zzero4 C TF, Comfort, and FR 10 178 cm, with Coll Tex 60/40 mohair/nylon skins for powder as the widest and “biggest” rig in my ski touring quiver
– Zzero3 C TF, Speed ,and Seven Summit 178 cm with Coll Tex nylon skins for wet/ granular snow is the versatile all-around rig
– TLT4 EVO TF, Speed, and K2 Chogori 174 cm with nylon Ascension skins is my lightest and most comfortable, but still capable and versatile, rig.

Colorado backcountry skiing.
Rob, on one of his three rigs.

As the culmination of my ski touring gear quest I feel that these boot and ski combinations are all well-matched and give great performance.

My use of the gear is for randonnee ski touring in the Washington Cascades, mostly in the Wenatchee Mountains to the east of the crest. I enjoy traveling through beautiful and elegant mountain terrain equally as well as skiing powder. When skiing downhill in the backcountry, I am conservative and have never been injured throughout more than 1000 ski tour days since my first skinny-ski touring in 1976. Thus, I am not pushing much on my ski touring gear as far as style is concerned. I like to be smooth, but I am a bit large for someone that ski tours this much at 225 pounds plus a well-packed ABS backpack on powder days. The gear on my feet is certainly tested for durability.

The 88 waist FR 10 seems to be as wide of a ski as I want to walk around the mountains on, and except for powder skiing I prefer a narrower ski for mountain travel. Starting in March when my tours will include ski carry and walking on hard snow, rocks, and dirt I prefer the 3-buckle boot.

Some individuals (my wife?) may view the purchase of the Zzero4 and Zzero3 as, uh, extravagant or worse (along with another snowmobile purchase last spring). Having done so and now having used the gear for many days in various snow and terrain conditions, I am very pleased and feel that the choice is justified. That is a good thing, since I promised said wife to buy no ski gear for myself for at least three seasons (except in the case of replacement of broken gear — amazing how that occurs just when you need something, is it not, dear?)

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Backcountry skiing in the Wenatchee Mountains.

In regard to the Zzero4C TF I will confirm all of the superlatives directed toward the boots thus far, and will respectfully disagree with the few less than glowing comments. The Zzero4C TF is indeed light, powerful, well made, smooth-functioning and comfortable ski touring boot. The buckles and walk/ski lever function well and are of high quality. The boot fit me so well out of the box that I did not heat the liners, and it continues to fit well after 50+ ski tour days. At this point after many great powder days, I almost take for granted the stiff, powerful performance of the boot, similar to a lift-gear feel, applied to my moderately stiff FR 10 ski.

In my use, the Zzero4C TF does feel a bit tall for walking and side hilling. This tall feeling is not really an issue during powder snow season, but is noticeable on steep side hilling when the base is a firm crust and somewhat more so with the 88 mm waist FR 10. This condition also accounts for my continued use of narrower-waisted skis such as the 80 mm Seven Summit and 70 mm Chogori for some crusted snow or tour conditions. The Zzero4C TF is noticeably light. However my size 29 pair still weigh 8 lbs on the local shipping store scale. It appears that the increase in size from the usually advertised size 27 boot to my size 29 results in a significant comparable weight increase in all of my various boots.

The Zzero4C TF replaced my 3-buckle Aero TF which is a significantly stiff 3-buckle boot that weighs 8.8 lbs. for the pair. While significantly lighter, the Zzero4C TF compared to the Aero 3-buckle gives easily 30 to 40 percent more power for downhill skiing. Before owning the Zzero4C TF I sometimes wished that my FR 10 ski would be easier and more versatile, but the powerful Zzero4C TF boot with carbon-stringer stiffened cuffs now pretty much has its way with that ski. To summarize my take on this boot: Get some.

Below the cuff, the Zzero3C appears to be much the same boot as the Zzero4C — light but solid and stiff. The lateral cuff carbon stringers found on the Zzero4C are not on the Zzero3, and the feel of the cuff is less stiff as one would expect. I would expect that if the Zzero3C cuff was carbon-stringer stiffened it may be uncomfortably stiff for such a shorter (than the Zzero4C) lever. The shorter cuff makes for a much different boot feel that is excellent for my use. The fit was the same, I did not heat the liners since it fit so well, and continues to fit well. The buckle and walk/ ski lever are of similar high-quality.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Access gear.

One small problem with the Zzero3C is that the overlapping shell under the top buckle tends to override itself when the top buckle is left open for walking. Aside from that, I really like the Zzero3C TF on my Seven Summit skis. With the Zzero3C TF and Seven Summit skis I have skied corn, powder, crust, breakable crust, wind pack. That rig does well in all conditions.

My bigger rig, FR 10 and Zzero4C, have more power but also more weight for walking and for me the higher cuff of the Zzero4 is noticeable and at times less comfortable than the Zzero3C. So, to restate it, the Seven Summit and Zzero3C perform solidly in all conditions, no complaints, with excellent all-condition versatility. With the shorter cuff on the Zzero3C I find my self bending my knees more, perhaps getting more of the comma body position in tougher snow conditions when compared to the stand up and point ’em capability of the heavier rig, the FR 10 and Zzero4C.

Ski touring side hill on crusted snow, walking and kick-stepping on snow, and walking on rocks or dirt is considerably more comfortable and efficient using the Zzero3C when compared to the Zzero4C. The light weight of the Zzero3C TF on one’s feet is impressive. My size 29 Zzero3C TF boots weigh 7.3 lbs for the pair. The comfort and light weight is the big advantage, however the power/ performance of the Zzero3C is also impressive. The 7.3 lb. Zzero3C TF is a leap forward improvement in both weight and performance over my 8.8 lb 3-buckle Aero TF. I am pleased to own the Zzero3C TF, and I find it to be my favorite for the intended-use/conditions.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
President, CEO and chief bottle washer for the RRC (Republican Randonnee Club), how does the club sticker look on the 7 Summits?

For comparison I should discuss and contrast my TLT 4 EVO TF/ Speed/ Chogori 174 cm rig. Yes, my third, lightest weight rig has a place for ski touring, and I truly enjoy it. The boot and ski are well-matched for balanced performance. I have enjoyed turns in all conditions including some powder with the setup. The Chogori is a very capable and versatile ski, it carves well carrying my large carcass even at 174 cm length. The size 29 TLT4 EVO TF boot weighs 6.7 lbs., just 0.6 lbs less than the much-more powerful Zzero3C TF.

Less weight isn’t everything — the TLT 4 EVO TF boot is also much more comfortable for walking on skis, or on snow, dirt, rocks, or just standing around. The flexible cuff of the TLT 4 EVO TF is quite comfortable,though it does yield less turning power for the downhill. In spite of the lack of power, I enjoy making turns using a different style while using the TLT 4 EVO TF, compensating for more powerful (and heavier) gear with technique, style, and less speed. For walking around tight terrain, covering miles, and skiing downhill on moderate terrain this rig is excellent.

So which boot would I pick, more, which rig would I pick, if I could have only one? Difficult question. All three of my setups are well-balanced and I can have fun skiing my usual tours in any condition on any of the three. I recall transitioning away from lift gear and lift ski-style when my randonnee skiing displaced lift skiing, so I understand that some skiers accustomed to lift gear, or more hardcore downhill skiing, may prefer the bigger, stiffer gear in order to enjoy the tour. Without a snowmobile to cover the road miles to get to the good stuff, I would less prefer the Zzero4C TF, but when the powder is steep and deep the Zzero4C TF is the boot to have. Perhaps the logical answer for me would be the Zzero3C TF and Seven Summit, a rig with excellent capability in all conditions. But, perhaps not….luckily I don’t have to decide.

Dynafit backcountry skiing.
Blackie tries to show Rob he doesn’t need all that gear. But then, who’s in front?

Shop for Dynafit skis and boots here.

(Guest blogger Rob Mullins lives in the Washington Cascades with his family. His life has included a succession of careers that allow him to live in the mountains and ski tour a lot.)

Rob Mullins

Rob Mullins lives in the Washington Cascades with his wife, daughter, and a black lab avalanche dog in training named Blackie.

wildsnow.com
April 17, 2008 34 comments
0 Email
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Gear Reviews

  • Boot Reviews
  • Ski Reviews
  • Binding Reviews
  • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
  • Book Reviews
  • Misc Gear Reviews

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Polar Star Inn Hut Report: Mellow Skiing and Epic Sunsets

    March 7, 2025
  • 2

    Ski Touring Pants Guide: Softshells, Hardshells, and Hybrids

    December 9, 2024
  • 3

    How to Fuel for Ski Touring: Nutritionist Q&A

    February 25, 2024
  • 4

    Visualizing the Backcountry as a Splitboarder: Minimizing the Challenges of Movement by Anticipating Terrain

    December 5, 2022
  • 5

    Much more than a steep ski: Fischer Transalp 92 CTI Long-Term Review

    January 31, 2025

Recent Posts

  • A Small Hut for Big Skiing in the San Juans: Aladdin’s Lamp

    April 23, 2024
  • Revisiting a 2011 Trip Report: Adventure in the Pickets — Thread of Ice Ski Descent

    December 9, 2022
  • Feeding the Backcountry Soul on Crete

    August 25, 2022
  • WildSnowNZ — French Ridge Hut

    July 25, 2022
  • Friends and Resupplies on a Ski Traverse of The Colorado Trail

    July 13, 2022


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • About Lou Dawson
  • Terms of Service
  • Authors Page
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright & Legal
  • Website Security

@2025 - All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by WildSnow


Back To Top