– The Backcountry Ski Site
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures

– The Backcountry Ski Site

  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures
   

Tech Bindings for Ski Touring – 10 Things to Know

by Lou Dawson October 24, 2014
written by Lou Dawson October 24, 2014

No snow yet? Do some shopping for this year’s clothing over at Backcountry.com.

Dynafit Radical ST backcountry skiing binding.

Dynafit TLT Radical ST 'tech' backcountry skiing binding.

1. Here at WildSnow.com we define “tech” binding as any ski binding that uses special steel boot TOE socket fittings invented by Fritz Barthel and popularized by Dynafit. Most of the Barthel binding patents expired some time ago, thus allowing the tech binding and associate boot toe fittings to become a de facto standard that’s “copied” by numerous makers.

2. Most tech bindings use special steel boot heel fittings as well, with the exception of Marker Kingpin. (A broader category is “frameless” bindings, simply meaning the heel and toe units are not connected by a plate, but could use any type of boot fittings. Trab TR2 binding is a good example of a frameless binding that we would not call a “tech” binding as it uses proprietary boot fittings at both toe and heel.)


The usual tech fittings for Dynafit and other types of tech bindings.

The usual boot toe tech fittings for Dynafit and other types of tech bindings. Click images to enlarge.

3. Unlike alpine bindings that are quite forgiving as to the shape of the boot sole, tech bindings are dependent on the quality and tight tolerances of the steel boot fittings on the boot toe and heel. There is no official industry standard for the exact shape of the boot fittings, though the sizing and metallurgy of the Dynafit brand fittings is a de facto standard. Apparently, the ISO ski touring boot standard 9523 is under revision for the location of the boot fittings in relation to the rest of the boot, but does not appear to address the manufacturing standards for the actual fittings other than in brief terms. The ideal fittings are quite sophisticated, with a varied radius of the toe sockets that resists pre-release in touring mode (heel somewhat elevated) but smooths out release when the boot is in the flatter alpine position. Most current fittings have been dumbed down, without the varied radius. Sad, but they still work if the user is diligent about locking the toe for touring mode.

Clip removed. Should be obvious to folks who know tech bindings, but one has to wonder how many boot buyers will be seen using frame bindings with this clip still in the boot toe? And, WildSnow kudos to the first person to find one in a skin track.

Boot with the red Dynafit fitting clip “seal” separated; it clips to the toe fittings.

As far as we know, Dynafit provides their fittings to two other boot makers, Scarpa and Fisher. The Dynafit fittings are indicated by a red plastic “seal” clip that’s attached to the new boot. All other boot makers have their own fittings manufactured by various third parties. In our experience ALL boot fittings, including Dynafit, must be immediately tested for proper release function by an experienced do-it-yourselfer or ski shop technician. The boot should release to the side at the heel smoothly (if the binding releases at the heel) without catching at the toe sockets during the second stage of the release movement. There should be no rattle or slop, no clicking while striding in touring mode, and (with reasonable uphill technique) no problems with coming out of the binding while locked in touring mode.

4. Beware of blaming tech binding problems on the binding, when they’re actually caused by the boot fittings. Test interface problems such as play and sticky release by substituting several other pairs of boots, of various brands. If the problem goes away, it is probably the boot!


Fritschi Vipec opens to the side at the toe for lateral (twisting) safety release; most tech bindings instigate lateral release with heel rotation while the boot simultaneously comes out of the binding toe.

Fritschi Vipec opens to the side at the toe for lateral (twisting) safety release; most tech bindings instigate lateral release with heel rotation while the boot simultaneously comes out of the binding toe.

5. Know that all tech bindings that side release at the heel actually have a “two stage” release. This means the heel of the boot moves to the side, then the toe wings open or do a combination of rotating and opening. Fritschi Vipec is the notable exception to this; it opens to the side at the toe as the first and only stage of lateral release (and is similar to most alpine bindings in this regard). It remains to be seen which (if any) of these ways of releasing are safer than others. Companies are making claims, but we’ve seen no studies or data based on real world use.

6. There has never been a major brand tech binding design family, of any brand, that did not have subsequently corrected problems in the first retail versions. In the opinion of certain informed insider sources, it is a miracle some of these episodes have not come under the purview of certain government entities that shall remain nameless herein.

7. Tech bindings were originally designed for ski touring and ski mountaineering using narrow skis and soft ski mountaineering boots of the 1980s. Repurposing the design as a freeride binding is problematic. We feel a “tech 2.0” complete redesign of the system — including boot fittings — is the solution. But standards, even unofficial ones, die hard. The engineering being done to force freeride performance from the tech system is amazing. It’s like making a Formula 1 racer from a Volkswagen — on a limited budget. See our ski touring binding museum.


8. It is an open question if ANY tech binding matches the safety (injury protection) of recent and top quality alpine bindings paired with alpine boots. In our opinion, most tech bindings do NOT match the safety of a properly adjusted alpine setup. That being said, expert skiers commonly adjust their binding release values to excessively high settings, thus obviating any meaningful comparison of safety between binding types and models.

G3 ION is a good example of a beefy high quality tech binding that, while not certified to DIN 13992, appears to offer excellent performance and beef.

G3 ION is a good example of a beefy high quality tech binding that, while not certified to DIN 13992, appears to offer excellent performance and beef.

9. Few tech bindings are overall appropriate for more than occasional resort skiing for two reasons: excessive wear on the binding, as well as safety release and shock absorption that’s in some cases not as good as alpine bindings. Possible exceptions are the DIN/ISO 13992 certified offerings such as Marker Kingpin and Dynafit Beast, as well as certain non certified tech bindings that are obviously beefed and marketed for hard use. A good example is Fritschi Vipec. In any case, know that while the DIN/ISO 13992 standard for backcountry skiing bindings is NOT an alpine binding standard, it is quite similar and does give you some idea of a binding’s level of sophistication. That said, the ISO ski binding standards are not as modern nor as rigorous as one would assume. Do not regard them as the end-all be-all in criteria for picking a good binding. ISO 13992 standard explained.

10. Some Europeans call tech bindings “lowtech,” “pin” bindings or “pintech” bindings. We sometimes use the term “pintech” but shy from the term “pin” because that’s traditionally used for telemark bindings. For more terminology please check out our ski touring glossary.

For more information, please see our Dynafit and tech binding FAQ, as well as search results on our 3,000+ blog posts.

Lou Dawson

WildSnow.com publisher emeritus and founder Lou (Louis Dawson) has a 50+ years career in climbing, backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering. He was the first person in history to ski down all 54 Colorado 14,000-foot peaks, has authored numerous books about about backcountry skiing, and has skied from the summit of Denali in Alaska, North America’s highest mountain.

www.loudawson.com
0
Email
previous post
Remarkable Conditions & Remarkable Skis — Voile V8
next post
A Few Ski Touring Shopping Tidbits

Trip Reports

  • A Small Hut for Big Skiing in the San Juans: Aladdin’s Lamp

    April 23, 2024
  • Revisiting a 2011 Trip Report: Adventure in the Pickets — Thread of Ice Ski Descent

    December 9, 2022

Avalanche Department

  • Ask a Forecaster: Q&A with CAIC’s Andrew McWilliams

    March 10, 2024

Tips & Tricks

  • Transition Efficiencies 101 with Tech Binding Heel Units

    January 6, 2023
  • Visualizing the Backcountry as a Splitboarder: Minimizing the Challenges of Movement by Anticipating Terrain

    December 5, 2022
  • TURBOCHARGE YOUR TRAILHEAD BEACON CHECK

    November 15, 2022

Recent Comments

  • Daniel on Backcountry Ski Boots Buyer’s Guide: The Touring Boots Worth the Money
  • Jim Milstein on Best Touring Packs for Guides and Daytrippers
  • Bergen Tjossem on Much more than a steep ski: Fischer Transalp 92 CTI Long-Term Review
  • Maciej on Much more than a steep ski: Fischer Transalp 92 CTI Long-Term Review


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • About Lou Dawson
  • Terms of Service
  • Authors Page
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright & Legal
  • Website Security

@2025 - All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by WildSnow


Back To Top

Read alsox

Beyond the Basics: Packing For Your...

January 15, 2025

Click in and Go with the...

February 14, 2023

Salomon’s MTN Summit 12 BR Binding:...

February 2, 2023