– The Backcountry Ski Site
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures

– The Backcountry Ski Site

  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures
   

Written by Lou Dawson

Dynafit Low Tech Tourlite 1993

by Lou Dawson November 8, 2015
Dynafit Low Tech Tourlite 1993

In 1990 The first production models of the Dynafit branded Tourlite Tech (TLT) began limited circulation in Europe. The binding became widely available around 1992/93 and was first brought to North America during that period. (The first “Dynafit” type bindings were made by inventor Fritz Barthel and sold under the Low Tech brand beginning in 1986.)

The unconventional and fragile looking Dynafit(Low Tech) backcountry skiing binding was slow to catch on. While it did save an immense amount of weight over other brands, changing the vertical release setting required taking the heel unit apart and swapping a spring, and the vertical release tended to behave as if it was higher than the numbers printed on the springs indicated. Nonetheless, devoted ski alpinists quickly realized that the Dynafit saved so much weight it could markedly enhance their uphill aerobic performance. More, the diminutive grabber was far from fragile. In fact, it was much more durable than many other ski touring AT and telemark bindings of the era. Vastly improved over the next decade but remaining true to the original design shown here, Dynafit is now the most popular alpine ski touring binding in the world.

Complete 1993 Dynafit Tourlite Tech backcountry skiing binding shown above. The pink and purple color scheme is typical of late 1980s and early 1990s style.

Complete 1993 Dynafit Tourlite Tech backcountry skiing binding shown above. The pink and purple color scheme is typical of late 1980s and early 1990s style.

Heel unit with a DIN 5 vertical release spring, DIN 9 spring sitting on top is installed by removing the pink top plate and swapping.

Heel unit with a DIN 5 vertical release spring, DIN 9 spring sitting on top is installed by removing the pink top plate and swapping.

Lateral (side) release is adjusted with a conventional barrel and spring slightly visible at the right end of the binding. As with many earlier models of Dynafit TLT, the original Tourlite is only adjustable for a small range of boot length (in this case, about a centimeter). The green disks on top of the heel lift post can be stacked for more height.


Detail showing how ends (rods/pins) of the release spring insert in the boot heel, which has a metal fitting the pins ride against.

Detail showing how ends (rods/pins) of the release spring insert in the boot heel, which has a metal fitting the pins ride against.

For vertical release the tapered fitting forces the spring apart and the boot pops up and out. Today’s Dynafits work exactly the same way, only the release is adjustable with a screw driver instead of a spring swap.

Toe unit is nearly identical to today's Dynafit models. Main difference is that the wings could be taken apart by removing threaded fasteners (current ones are riveted).

Toe unit is nearly identical to today’s Dynafit models. Main difference is that the wings could be taken apart by removing threaded fasteners (current ones are riveted).

Main difference from most of today’s tech binding is that the wings could be taken apart by removing threaded fasteners (current ones are riveted). The pivot pins that insert into the boot toe holes were also removable, presumably to ease their replacement if they wore out. Wear has not proved to be a problem with Dynafit pivot pins, and current model’s are swaged in and not removable.

Toe unit is nearly identical to today's Dynafit and many other brand's tech ski touring binding models.

Toe detail showing how pivot pins insert in boot toe fittings/sockets. In lateral release the pins ride out of the tapered sockets.

Binding without boot. If it looks minimal that's because it is. In all, one of the great technological advances in modern skiing.

Binding without boot. If it looks minimal that’s because it is. In all, one of the great technological advances in modern skiing.

History of the Dynafit (Low Tech) Binding as of 2015
Dynafit bindings (and other “tech” bindings”) are enormously popular. All accounts report hundreds of thousands sold throughout the world, and one of the binding co-inventors told me they sold more than 13,000 pair a year during the late 1990s and 2000s. They are used by everyone from weekend warriors, to guides logging hundreds of thousands of vertical feet, to competitive ski mountaineering “skimo” racers who treat ski mountaineering like a stair master workout.


In the mid 1980s, rumors circulated of people who were experimenting with building binding parts into ski boots. The goal was to eliminate redundant parts, especially the plate that connected most randonnee binding’s toe and heel units. Rumor held that people were building the spring bars from a Ramer backcountry skiing binding into a boot, so all you needed on the ski was a heel unit and the toe pivots from the Ramer (Ramer binding museum displays.)

As it were, a Tyrolean father son team (of Austrian nationality), both mechanical engineers, were inventing the TLT binding in their garage (the binding was then known as the “Low Tech”.) Manfred Barthel, the father, supported his son Fritz who went through years of intense research and development to come up with a workable and durable unit they could sell to the public. For the first prototype constructed in 1983-1984 they indeed used Ramer parts for mockup, and subsequently tested their designs in Europe and during trips to Canada. The Barthels, inspired as they were, took the concept of using the boot as the binding plate and refined it to an astonishing degree.

In the mid to late 1980s the Barthels made the binding themselves and retrofitted the boot fittings in a small factory in the basement of their family home. At that time they called the binding “Low Tech,” which is still the name of Fritz Barthel’s engineering consulting business. For boots the Barthels picked a Dynafit touring model that was lightweight and functional, and thus developed a relationship with the Dynafit boot company, who then purchased rights to brand, manufacture and sell the Barthel Low Tech binding (as well as selling boots with the fittings factory installed.) The binding was eventually named “Dynafit” once the Dynafit company began handling it.


The Dynafit company and brand was founded in 1950 (bought by Kneissl in 1995 and now owned by Salewa), and produced excellent alpine ski boots for years. In 1983 Dynafit introduced the classic red Tourlite randonnee AT ski boot. This boot was a fraction of the weight of other backcountry skiing boots, skied as well, was quite warm, and even doubled as a decent winter climbing boot (Colorado’s Gary Neptune climbed Mount Everest in his). This was the boot the Barthels picked for installing their binding fittings, and the boot Dynafit later sold with the fittings factory installed.

In the beginning, the Barthel family operated a coffee shop out of their house in Bad Haering, Austria. Fritz Bathel had a fully featured workshop in the basement, where he developed the binding.

When the Barthels decided to go commercial with their binding, they had to hand-install fittings in the ski boots. They soon got Dynafit to supply boots with the toe fittings molded in, but still had to mill the heel fittings. At one time around 1986 the Barthel house stored around a thousand pairs of Dynafit boots awaiting fitting installs and customers.

“The boots filled the house from basement to attic,” said Fritz in a 2010 interview by this author, “the thing was, we didn’t have any customers…” That was soon to change as the “tech” binding system steadily gained popularity due to its astounding lack of mass and excellent durability.

Eventually, the Dynafit boot company licensed the complete system from Fritz. Installing and marketing it themselves.

The Dynafit brand was bought by Salewa in 2003 and resurrected as a ski touring equipment company that included the Dynafit binding.

The Dynafit TLT binding was first brought to North America in 1993, and while not immediately popular was adopted by a few savvy ski mountaineers and gradually grew in favor with skiers worldwide. Manfred and Fritz Barthel deserve a huge amount of credit for bringing their binding to market, then refining it over the next decade. And let’s not forget Paul Ramer, who’s ball-and-socket binding concept was inverted and shrunk to create the pivot mechanism for the Dynafit.

Weight: One 1993 TLT binding with screws, no safety strap or brake, 12.3 oz., 348 g
(Current model TLT weighs a few grams more.)

These bindings were provided to Lou Dawson in 1993 by Lock Miller, owner of Marmot Mountain Works. Lock was the first North American retail importer of the Dynafit binding. Thanks Lock!

Dynafit Tourlite 1992 thumb.

Dynafit Tourlite 1992 thumb.

Share
Email

Trip Reports

  • A Small Hut for Big Skiing in the San Juans: Aladdin’s Lamp

    April 23, 2024
  • Revisiting a 2011 Trip Report: Adventure in the Pickets — Thread of Ice Ski Descent

    December 9, 2022

Avalanche Department

  • Ask a Forecaster: Q&A with CAIC’s Andrew McWilliams

    March 10, 2024

Tips & Tricks

  • Transition Efficiencies 101 with Tech Binding Heel Units

    January 6, 2023
  • Visualizing the Backcountry as a Splitboarder: Minimizing the Challenges of Movement by Anticipating Terrain

    December 5, 2022
  • TURBOCHARGE YOUR TRAILHEAD BEACON CHECK

    November 15, 2022

Recent Comments

  • Daniel on Backcountry Ski Boots Buyer’s Guide: The Touring Boots Worth the Money
  • Jim Milstein on Best Touring Packs for Guides and Daytrippers
  • Bergen Tjossem on Much more than a steep ski: Fischer Transalp 92 CTI Long-Term Review
  • Maciej on Much more than a steep ski: Fischer Transalp 92 CTI Long-Term Review


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • About Lou Dawson
  • Terms of Service
  • Authors Page
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright & Legal
  • Website Security

@2025 - All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by WildSnow


Back To Top