– The Backcountry Ski Site
  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures

– The Backcountry Ski Site

  • Avalanches
  • Gear Reviews
    • Ski Reviews
    • Boot Reviews
    • Binding Reviews
    • Snowboard Splitboard
    • Book Reviews
    • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
    • Airbag Backpacks
    • Backcountry Electronics
    • Misc Gear Reviews
  • Podcast
  • Tips & Tricks
    • Ski Touring Basics
    • Boot Fitting
    • Fitness & Health
    • Gear Mods
  • Trip Reports
    • Fourteeners
    • Huts – Cabins – Lodges
    • Denali McKinley
    • 8,000 Meter Skiing
  • Stories
    • History
    • Humor
    • Land Use Issues
    • Evergreen Ski Touring
    • Poetry
  • Resources
    • All Posts Listed
    • 100 Recent Comments
    • Backcountry Skiing & Ski Touring Webcams
    • Ski Weights Comparison
    • Archives of WildSnow.com
    • Authors Page
    • Ski Touring Bindings
      • Trab TR2 Index and FAQ
      • Salomon Guardian & Tracker
      • Naxo Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Silvretta Pure Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Marker F10-12 Duke Baron
      • G3 Onyx Ski Binding FAQ
      • G3 ION Ski Touring Binding
      • Fritschi Backcountry Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Fritschi Diamir Frame Bindings Mount DIY
      • Fritschi Diamir Bindings FAQ
      • Fritschi Tecton FAQ
      • Atomic Salomon Backland MTN
      • Dynafit Tri-Step Binding 2001-2003
      • Naxo randonnee alpine touring AT ski binding FAQ
      • Dynafit Skiing Bindings – Info Index
      • Dynafit Binding Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Review 1
      • Dynafit Beast 16 FAQ Page Two
    • History
      • Ski Touring Binding Museum
      • Trooper Traverse Intro & Index
      • Randonnee Ski Touring “AT” ski gear — What is Hip?
      • Chronology
    • Backcountry Skiing Core Glossary
    • Gear Review Policy & Disclosures

Liner Comparo — Palau (Dynafit/Garmont) & Scarpa/Intuition Aftermarket Version

by Lou Dawson December 5, 2007
written by Lou Dawson
Dynafit and Intuition liners.
The selection.

So many boot liners — so little time. I was chanting that mantra when during this past weekend I noticed that Garmont and Dynafit thermo liners are made by the same purveyor of foam, Palau in France. Excellent — I could test the molding process and performance of three different boot brand’s liners in a simple two-pair comparison of Scarpa/Intuition and Palau.

Dynafit and Intuition liners.
Checking the Scarpa temperature while molding. A bit cool because the liner had only cooked for part of its allotted 15 minutes.

While all three boot makers (Dynafit, Garmont, Scarpa) are recommending their thermo liners be heated with a blower system while in the boot, doing so is tough to rig for the do it yourselfer. So I stuck with using my convection oven, and could have easily molded them in a regular oven using the correct technique (pre-heat oven, protect boot from radiant heat scorching, and turn off oven soon after you put the liner in thus letting the ambient heat of the oven do the work.).

Oven mold temp for both types of liners is 250 degrees for 15 minutes, so that’s what I stuck with. To be sure, I shot the oven interior with my infrared thermometer, and checked the actual surface of the liner as well while it was heating. You can do the same thing with an accurate oven thermometer. Just be careful since over-heating these things will ruin them.

Both the Intuition and Palau liners puffed out nicely in the allotted time. For molding, I first stuck my footbeds in the liner, followed by my foot, then slipped the whole shebang into the Zzero boot. A spray of silicon eased the process. One interesting problem I had was that my footbeds are quite flexible in the toe area, and tended to get curled up by the liner and press against my toes. A stiffer footbed would prevent this. I also had a bit of trouble making sure the bottom of the liner ended up being the bottom after molding. They’re so flexible and puffed up when they come out of the oven that you can end up with all sorts of funny twisted configurations is you’re not careful. Working solo didn’t help with this, as a boot fitter can inspect things before you insert — more, this is of course one of the reasons why molding in the boots with a blower works well.

Next, time to go skiing. I opted for the Intuition liners, as they felt a bit stiffer and I though it would be fun to get the most beef possible out of the Zzero. We ended up at Snowmass Resort (Colorado) in some chopped pow, and the combo was actually too stiff! Conclusion from that is that the aftermarket Intuition liners definitely have presence. They’ll make a terrific addition to a softer boot such as a Garmont Megaride, but might not be necessary in an already stiff boot such as the Green Machine. That is, unless you want the max agro boot combo. In that case, all bets are off. Swap in an Intuition liner, swap on a stiffer tongue, crank down that power strap — and race World Cup downhill in your AT boots. With the aftermarket options available now, it appears any whining about soft AT boots is a thing of the past.

Funny thing is, even though the current North American AT fad appears to be beefy rando boots, I’m still partial to lighter ones that have a slightly softer feel. Thus, the Zzero with its comfy Palau stock liner is my first choice. Indeed, this was validated today when I did an uphill today with the Palau, it is indeed the correct liner for what I want in a boot as stiff as the Zzero, and having a regular tongue allows my shin some forward movement while walking that’s slightly more comfortable than a wrap-around such as Intuiton. But I like the Scarpa/Intuitions as well, and will use them in my softer AT boots — perhaps my Scarpa Matrix or even my F1s.

Dynafit and Intuition liners.
For skiing the liners last weekend we were thinking of doing some earn-your-turns at a closed resort, but instead headed for Aspen Mountain, knowing fresh snow would have blanketed some of their groom. Mistake. Instead of being mechanically whisked up to a white wonderland we were greeted by this gigantic crowd and a closed gondola. Not the best of mornings for the Aspen Skiing Company. Instead of waiting in line we headed for Snowmass Resort, and ended up waiting in line there as well. Oh well… I got the boots skied, but should have just gone uphilling instead of riding lifts.

Dynafit and Intuition liners.
While driving through Aspen I got this one-handed “street” shot through our truck window of the classic Hotel Jerome. It’s a beautiful building that embodies the history of the old mining town. Jerome is now a bit pricey for a bed, but they’re not charging for photos — yet. Amazing what the little Canon A720 can come up with, isn’t it?

More thermo liner molding tips here, and in our Ski Boot Fitting Category.

Lou Dawson

WildSnow.com publisher emeritus and founder Lou (Louis Dawson) has a 50+ years career in climbing, backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering. He was the first person in history to ski down all 54 Colorado 14,000-foot peaks, has authored numerous books about about backcountry skiing, and has skied from the summit of Denali in Alaska, North America’s highest mountain.

www.loudawson.com
December 5, 2007 23 comments
0 Email

Let the Boot Fitting Commence — Zzero Round One

by Lou Dawson November 20, 2007
written by Lou Dawson

The “new” thing in thermo liner molding is to heat the liner while inside the boot, with an expensive ($300 pro price) blower system that you’ll generally have to seek out a dealer to find. Not only will that entail dealing with store hours and finding the person who actually knows what they’re doing, but re-molding will require repeated trips to the store — with the aforementioned hassles.

Home baking liners is a tradition in the backcountry skiing community, so why this back step? It is indeed nice to heat the liner in the boot. It stays lasted (shaped) and holds position so you don’t have the issue of quickly, but nonetheless carefully placing the liner in the shell before it cools. But, and it’s a big BUT, if you’re molding with custom footbeds you’ll probably need to remove the heated liner from the boot, put your ‘beds in, then stick the liner back in the boot — thus actually making the process more complex by adding one more step.

Zzero backcountry skiing boot fitting.
Dynafit Zzero boot with my homebrew blower system. It didn’t work.

Still, this being the WildSnow.com World HQ of backcountry homebrew, for round one of fitting my Zzero “Green Machines” I tried to cobble up a blower system for heating the liners. After all, one has to be loyal to the innovations and standards of the industry — at least to the point of giving them a shot. My homebrew failed, but I learned quite a bit in the process.

(Note: I skied in the Dynafit Zzero a few weeks ago but used them without molding the liner. I can’t wait to get them tuned up and really cranking! Exciting.)

We’ve got a temp adjustable heat gun and an accurate infrared “gun style” thermometer. A quick trip to NAPA yielded a chunk of heat resistant tubing that fit on the end of the heat gun. I cut some slots in the tube to distribute the heat, stuck the rig in a boot, and fired it up. I got the temperature right (around 250 degrees) by experimenting and grabbing multiple readings with our thermometer “gun” (nice tool, by the way, highly recommended), but couldn’t get the boot to heat evenly. After fiddling around till the point of diminishing returns was reached, I grabbed our convection oven and went back to the standard method. Doing it that way worked fine, so that’s the upside of this experiment.

Conclusion: Don’t let the “new” way of molding liners scare you away from home baking. Sure, if you can find a store with the gear and a helpful human, go for it. Otherwise, excellent cookbooks exist such as this one. More, since we tend to regular blogs about boot fitting, I made a “Boot Fitting” category in our category index in the sidebar to your right. Here is a quick link to our Boot Fitting category index.

Noon today, this came in from Scarpa and I found it worth publishing and commenting on:

Lou, to assist people with getting a proper fit, SCARPA made a shell fit tool this season, taking the mystery out of using your fingers to fit shells sizes. We are making these available to retailers and they are also available through SNA. Since people have fingers of different thicknesses, that method is inexact to say the least. So SCARPA had a tool made that slips behind the heel. When placed behind the heel in one direction, it measures the upper end of how much room a skier should have in a shell (standing flat in the shell with toes just in the front of the shell). Rotated on its side, it measures the minimum amount of space one should have in a shell fit. So it’s easy to get an objective standard for how much room a person should have in a shell fit.

I’ve seen that Scarpa tool and it’s a good idea. Would be easy to make one for home use, dimension is 14 x 20 millimeters. Regarding stacked fingers, this is indeed imprecise but since everyone’s foot volume is different the “space behind the heel” method is only a starting point for boot fitting, not the end-all be-all. Thus, my take is that the stacked fingers is still valid — though the fit tool would be nice. BTW, can anyone find this on the Scarpa website? I’d like to link to it…

Another addendum: If you do use custom foot beds, another method of getting them into the heated liner is to hold them on your foot with a nylon stocking, then insert foot/footbed into the heated liner while the liner is in the boot. Using this method would be perfect for working with liners heated by in-boot blower.

Lou Dawson

WildSnow.com publisher emeritus and founder Lou (Louis Dawson) has a 50+ years career in climbing, backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering. He was the first person in history to ski down all 54 Colorado 14,000-foot peaks, has authored numerous books about about backcountry skiing, and has skied from the summit of Denali in Alaska, North America’s highest mountain.

www.loudawson.com
November 20, 2007 17 comments
0 Email

Garmont Axon & Endorphin Comparo — Paul Parker Speaks

by Paul Parker November 14, 2007
written by Paul Parker

You guys asked for it, so I got in touch with Paul Parker of Garmont, he shared the beta on the latest Garmont boots.

Hi Lou,

Thanks for writing up the Axon, we’re excited about bringing that boot out and it’s good to see the interest. Here are some main points of comparison between Axon and Endorphin:

— The question of the Axon just being an “Endorphin with Dynafit fittings” is one I can clear up. In ski boots, there is rarely such a thing as “just.” Certainly the concept was born from the Endorphin, and the excellent walkability as well as skiing performance are Endorphine trait. But the two boots are are entirely different molds since the sole configuration, zeppa (footboard), fit, and Dynafit fittings are all unique to the Axon.

— Regarding having swappable soles AND Dynafit compatibility. This would be great in a perfect world and was something that we indeed researched. Unfortunately, there isn’t enough room to have both and stay within DIN norm. The plastic sole that is part of the interchangeable-soled shell would have to be thicker to accept the Dynafit fittings, which would take it out of norm.

— The big benefit of the Axon is the “package” when it’s combined with a Dynafit binding. Great skiing, great touring. It is stiff, its plastic is the same same stiffness as the Endorphin. In a traditional step-in AT binding the Axon will ski similarly to an Endorphin. In a Dynafit binding, which holds the boot especially securely (as Lou has pointed out many times here on WildSnow), it skis with the precise feel of a full-on alpine setup. (For that precise alpine feel, the Endorphin does have the option of using the ISO Alpine sole, which is compatible with an alpine step-in and doesn’t compress like a rubber touring sole does.)

— New liner in the Axon is significantly improved. It uses a new design with a separately-sewn sole that sits flatter in the boot, your footbed sits flatter in the liner, and the liner gets the most width out of the shell without increasing volume. It has a low-profile lacing system which is especially nice for touring. It has an improved fit before thermoforming, a plus for trying on boots and evaluating fit before molding (though of course they should ALWAYS be thermoformed before use).

— Axon has a removable micropore footbed (zeppa) like an alpine boot, adding insulation, and easily modified by a bootfitter.

Cheers,
Paul

Previous Axon post.

Paul Parker

Known as a gear designer and writer, Paul has vast experience in the ski equipment industry. Safe to say he’s probably one of the top dozen guys in the world when it comes to designing ski boots.

wildsnow.com
November 14, 2007 7 comments
0 Email

Axon Unboxed — More Dynafit Compatible Beef

by Lou Dawson November 11, 2007
written by Lou Dawson

Shop for Garmont ski boots here.

Word is out. Garmont had a boot at the feed lot. The Axon is now nicely fattened up and looks delicious. Check it out:

Garmont Axon one-rig backcountry skiing boot

Garmont Axon one-rig backcountry skiing boot
Compromises with this shoe are few. For example, instead of using a high arch to gain more rocker and allow a more conventional hiking style sole configuration, Garmont molds this boot with a nearly flat footboard that’s similar to nearly any conventional alpine boot. Advantage of this is that fit and ramp angle (toe vs. heel height) are easily tuned by a boot fitter. More, and this is trick, as indicated in the photo above it appears the thicker part of the sole has been designed as an optional place to shave if you want to eliminate most of the Axon’s sole rocker, thus making it fit better in some ski bindings — and even more alpine-like. Hold that thought to the next photo.

Garmont Axon one-rig backcountry skiing boot
Wow, reach into the Axon and what do we find? A footboard just like many alpine boots. Another thing to make your boot fitter smile.

Garmont Axon one-rig backcountry skiing boot
A minor but nonetheless interesting issue with Dynafit compatible boots is that some have very little sole material in the area of the toe, under the binding fittings and at the end of the sole. Garmont uses the earlier style Dynafit fittings which allow for more rubber, and they design in plenty of sole rubber in the whole toe area.

Garmont Axon one-rig backcountry skiing boot
Continuing the alpine theme. You probably won’t find this boot on a World Cup racer running the Hanenkam, but having a cuff cant rivet will be mightily appreciated by the percentage of population who need that sort of thing.

Garmont Axon one-rig backcountry skiing boot
Spoiler (AKA rear upper cuff) is removable for customization, and height adjustable.

Garmont Axon one-rig backcountry skiing boot
Another view of inside at cuff level. That elongated bump is a “flex limiter” that stops forward motion of the cuff at a certain point. These can easily be removed for a softer more progressive flex. Nice to have the option.

Garmont Axon one-rig backcountry skiing boot

And, the G-Fit liner. Fairly conventional albeit nicely made. Optional laces are essential for a conventional tongue inner boot. Good to have them! We’d give this liner a medium flex rating, if you want more beef you could easily swap in a harder liner. Then go run the Hanenkam.

In all, we’re impressed by this boot. It will no doubt fill an important niche — that of a beefy alpine-like shoe that yes, does allow you to use the best binding in the solar system.
Shop for Garmont ski boots here.

Lou Dawson

WildSnow.com publisher emeritus and founder Lou (Louis Dawson) has a 50+ years career in climbing, backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering. He was the first person in history to ski down all 54 Colorado 14,000-foot peaks, has authored numerous books about about backcountry skiing, and has skied from the summit of Denali in Alaska, North America’s highest mountain.

www.loudawson.com
November 11, 2007 22 comments
0 Email

Marker Duke and Baron Backcountry Skiing Bindings

by Lou Dawson November 7, 2007
written by Lou Dawson

Shop for Marker Duke and Baron backcountry skiing bindings.

Got your fork and knife at hand? Beef is definitely the hot subject this year, but not the kind you get from cattle. Rather the meal at hand is burly bindings and boots for backcountry skiing. I was looking at my website stats this morning and was amazed at how much traffic our Marker Duke and Baron information page is getting. FYI, Along with that, interest in stiffer AT boots has certainly reached an all-time high.

Whatever happened to the weight weenies? Did they all go back to bicycle racing or something? Perhaps not, since the introduction of true carbon fiber structure in an AT boot (Dynafit Zzero to be specific) is indeed resulting in some weight savings that can be applied to stiffer boots, though we’ll need the full-on carbon fiber ski boot to really see significant results from that trend.

Worthy blog reader T.G. has been checking out this exact subject and sent me an email the other day that I thought I’d pass on:

Lou,
In pure coincidence I happened to walk into a local mountain shop (Bag and Pack in Avon) during their Pro Night.” I’ve been a long time alpine ski instructor, so I’m familiar with pro nights usually being invitation only affairs. This was cool because no one seemed to mind a guy walking in off the street and perusing the goods. Of course I was immediately drawn to the Dynafit table and had the great opportunity to spend about 15 minutes talking with Kyle, who is apparently the Dynafit sales rep for this area.

I was able to look at the three different 4 buckle models in the Dynafit line, but the most interesting thing was the loose Power Stringer? pieces that Kyle had. I was able to handle the Power Stringer pieces made of both Rislan and carbon fiber. The Rislan stringers are really soft, they felt like Tupperware plastic, and I concluded that they can’t really provide much stiffness and are primarily cosmetic. On the other hand the carbon fiber stringers are very stiff and must certainly contribute more to the stiffness of the boot. It will be interesting to see ski comparison reviews of the Green Machine with the carbon stringers and the red boot with the Rislan stringers. Although the Rislan stringers probably don’t add much stiffness, the PU plastic used in the red boot is noticeably stiff than the Rislan used in the green boot, and will certainly get more stiff in the cold. On the other hand the red boot is definitely heavier, but it is quite a bit less expensive. In the cold the red boot could end up being more stiff and a better choice for side country or more alpine oriented skiers on snow tests should reveal the truth (hint, hint).

It was also interesting to see the growth in interest in alpine touring gear. This has been well documented, but it’s exciting to see. Of particular note was how much more widely available Dynafit products have become. When I bought my Dynafit bindings three years ago there wasn’t a shop nearby where I could get them, even in the central Colorado I-70 area. Now Kyle tells me that there are multiple shops within an hour of my home that are selling boots, bindings, and skis. One thing that’s really cool is that Bag and Pack in Avon is going to have a demo fleet of Dynafit gear this winter including skis, boots, and bindings. Wow. And Kyle added that the flow of Dynafit product being imported into the US is quite good so there shouldn’t be any problems getting a hold of the stuff.
T.G.

T.G.’s experience with the stringers is exactly my take. The carbon fiber is amazingly stiff for such a small piece of material, while the regular plastic stringers do make you wonder if they’re really necessary. On the other hand, because ergonomics comes into play here, I suspect even the softer plastic stringers might yield a beefier feel in real-world use. As for plastic that gets stiffer in the cold, I’m not a big fan of depending on that for performance, as the temps we get while skiing vary from sub-zero to blistering hot. But for the person who does most of their touring in winter temps, plastic that hardens in the cold will indeed provide more beef than is indicated during on carpet testing. So that’s a good thing to keep in mind while trying on in the store.

Shop for Marker Duke and Baron backcountry skiing bindings.

Lou Dawson

WildSnow.com publisher emeritus and founder Lou (Louis Dawson) has a 50+ years career in climbing, backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering. He was the first person in history to ski down all 54 Colorado 14,000-foot peaks, has authored numerous books about about backcountry skiing, and has skied from the summit of Denali in Alaska, North America’s highest mountain.

www.loudawson.com
November 7, 2007 14 comments
0 Email

New Garmont Axon — Another Dynafit Compatible Beef Boot

by Lou Dawson November 1, 2007
written by Lou Dawson

(defunct Garmont links removed)

Not to be outdone by stiff Dynafit compatible boots such as the Dynafit Zzero line, Garmont has entered the fray. We’ll be publishing a hands-on first look of these in a few days, and will have a pair out for WildSnow.com testing. Till then, here is a teaser. One of the more interesting things about this model, aside from it being a high performance boot with Dynafit fittings, is that it has a footboard that levels the shell arch so it’s flat, meaning it can be configured with custom foot beds just like an alpine boot — without endless grinding and other compensations for the shell’s footboard shape. Interesting that it has a cant mechanism as well, and the promo text mentions friendliness for customization. More info below photo, taken from press release so weights and such have not been real-world verified.

Garmont Axon backcountry skiing boot

Stiffness: Endorphin polymers; stiff forward flex and torsional rigidity

Weight: 2075 grams, 4.57 pounds (1/2 pr size 27.5).

Fit and Volume: Similar to the Endorphin, improved to include the flat footboard.

Micropore inner sole for warmth and shock absorption. This inner sole (zeppa) is removable and, like an alpine boot, can be customized by bootfitter.

Walk mechanism: Three-position cuff lock and walk mechanism: 20º, 25º, and free for walking

Rear Spoiler Removable with adjustable height.

Double Injected Cuff – The front of the cuff is injected with a softer durometer that wraps closely and around the lower leg for the quickest response, the sides and rear of the cuff are a stiffer durometer for lateral stiffness and support for leverage.

Double Injected Broadband Tongue – Creates a smooth, progressive forward flex, and disperses buckle pressure. Asymmetrical shape disperses shin pressure.

Lou Dawson

WildSnow.com publisher emeritus and founder Lou (Louis Dawson) has a 50+ years career in climbing, backcountry skiing and ski mountaineering. He was the first person in history to ski down all 54 Colorado 14,000-foot peaks, has authored numerous books about about backcountry skiing, and has skied from the summit of Denali in Alaska, North America’s highest mountain.

www.loudawson.com
November 1, 2007 9 comments
0 Email
Newer Posts
Older Posts

Gear Reviews

  • Boot Reviews
  • Ski Reviews
  • Binding Reviews
  • Avalanche Beacon Reviews
  • Book Reviews
  • Misc Gear Reviews

Popular Posts

  • 1

    Feeding the Backcountry Soul on Crete

    August 25, 2022
  • 2

    Wolverine Split Sticks: A Terrific Telescopic Pole For The Hard-Charging Splitboarder

    January 2, 2025
  • 3

    See You Tomorrow — The Disappearance of Snowboarder Marco Siffredi on Everest: A Book Review

    November 1, 2022
  • 4

    A Small Hut for Big Skiing in the San Juans: Aladdin’s Lamp

    April 23, 2024
  • 5

    Backcountry Ski Bibs: Why I Love Them, And My Favorite Pairs

    November 19, 2024

Recent Posts

  • A Small Hut for Big Skiing in the San Juans: Aladdin’s Lamp

    April 23, 2024
  • Revisiting a 2011 Trip Report: Adventure in the Pickets — Thread of Ice Ski Descent

    December 9, 2022
  • Feeding the Backcountry Soul on Crete

    August 25, 2022
  • WildSnowNZ — French Ridge Hut

    July 25, 2022
  • Friends and Resupplies on a Ski Traverse of The Colorado Trail

    July 13, 2022


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • About Lou Dawson
  • Terms of Service
  • Authors Page
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright & Legal
  • Website Security

@2025 - All Rights Reserved. Designed and Developed by WildSnow


Back To Top